05 JUN 2024 4 min READ Experience

Clash of the cultures

Working with a remote team? From a different culture? That has different values and ways of working? Not just different, but opposite? Yes, I made it work.

Short and sweet direct

I learned to be direct from an early age. In my culture, nobody hesitates to correct others, and criticism is delivered quite honestly. People usually speak to the point and keep their words concise. This style of communication can seem blunt, even when that's not intended. I never saw a problem with that since everyone around me communicated this way.

When I immigrated to Australia, I learned that people there were reserved, indirect, and conflict-averse. It took me a long time to find a balance between being honest and being blunt, between being concise and abrasive, expressing my opinion, but also considering others' perspectives.

I didn't expect changing my communication style to be such a big part of adapting to my new country. Even more so, I didn’t anticipate facing a whole new communication challenge when I started working with a remote team from South Asia.

Working with a remote team

Before I worked at SkoolBag, I didn’t have any experience with Sri Lankan culture, but I quickly realized they were very kind and sweet people, quiet, and respectful.

However, over time, I started noticing that developers rarely contributed their ideas and seemed to only want me to give them directions.

During the feature kick-off, no one would share their thoughts. By the time the feature was completed, the implementation looked very different from the original design, leaving me puzzled about what I might have missed.

Was I not explaining the requirements clearly enough? Why wouldn’t they ask me questions? They just quietly did it incorrectly.

When the time came for my annual review, one of the peer feedback was about improving my communication. I was so confused, no one had mentioned this to me throughout the year.

High and low context cultures

To investigate the issue further, I spoke with the Sri Lankan team lead. He introduced me to the concept of "high context" and “low context” cultures.

High context is characterized by a courteous and indirect speech style. In such cultures, people often prefer to insinuate rather than be explicit. Sri Lankans avoid saying "No" or providing negative feedback, even when they disagree, as it is considered rude. He also explained that there is a strong respect for seniority in Sri Lanka, and it is customary for more junior colleagues to stay quiet in group discussions.

My “low context” culture was on the opposite end of the spectrum, where I was outspoken and words carried most of the meaning.

High context vs Low context cultures
High context vs Low context cultures

Build a productive culture

To create a great product, we first needed to build a productive company culture. This culture had to be based on contribution and collaboration, with each team member doing their part to develop it.

Everyone took steps towards building this culture:

Culture was changing

All those ideas really helped to build such relationships, where sometimes I would get messages from developers out of nowhere suggesting a feature for the product they were not even working on.

The team became more engaged and felt empowered to make a difference.

Company culture is a process of accepting and understanding all the individual cultures in the team. Your company culture is unique and it takes time to build.